<menu id="ecmqg"><tt id="ecmqg"></tt></menu>
<nav id="ecmqg"></nav>
  • <nav id="ecmqg"><strong id="ecmqg"></strong></nav>
    <xmp id="ecmqg">
    <xmp id="ecmqg"><menu id="ecmqg"></menu>

    2020 5G Apple iPhones will be missing an important Qualcomm component

    2020 5G Apple iPhones will be missing an important Qualcomm component
    At the beginning of this year, the thought that Qualcomm would make the Apple iPhone, or any Apple product, a priority seemed laughable. Both companies were scheduled to appear in court as adversaries a number of times. The chipmaker was peeved at Apple because after it paid the company huge bonuses for being the exclusive modem chip supplier for the iPhone, Apple gave away half of that business to Intel starting with the iPhone 7. It also was angry because Apple complained about Qualcomm's alleged anti-competitive business practices in front of the Korean FTC.

    Apple was peeved as well. Qualcomm stopped paying Apple the aforementioned bonus and in private, Apple felt that the quality of Qualcomm's modem chips were not quite up to snuff. With the gang in Cupertino desperate, it turned to Intel to develop a 5G modem chip and by all indications, this component would be ready in time for 2020 iPhone production. Even though Apple had privately disparaged the quality of Qualcomm's modem chips, for 5G they were exactly what Apple wanted. So just as closing arguments started in a billion-dollar trial between Apple and Qualcomm, a major settlement was reached. Both companies decided to drop all legal action against each other and Apple paid Qualcomm approximately $4.5 billion. In return, Apple received a six-year licensing agreement with a two-year option (after all, Qualcomm is known for its no license, no chips policy) and a multi-year chip supply agreement. And in the end, everyone got what they wanted.

    Apple won't be using Qualcomm's RF front end until the 2021 iPhones are manufactured

    The idea that Qualcomm and Apple have buried the hatchet can be read into comments made this week by Qualcomm president Cristiano Amon. The executive told PCMag that "Priority number one of this relationship with Apple is how to launch their phone as fast as we can." And ironically, that includes not using Qualcomm's RF front end in the 2020 5G iPhone models. This technology converts information from the baseband into radio signals that can be sent or received over the air. When both sides agreed to that settlement in April, it might have been too late for Apple to change the 5G path it planned on using for 2020. Make no mistake about it though, the Snapdragon X55 5G modem chip will be used on the first iPhone models that support the next generation of wireless connectivity. That could hurt the 5G iPhone in 2020 since statements made by the chipmaker indicate that its 5G modem chip works best with its own RF front end.

    But you can't cry over spilled milk and besides, both parties are to blame for the mismatch in timing that prevents Apple from using Qualcomm's RF front end system in 2020. As Amon said, "We have a multi-year agreement with [Apple.] It's not one, it's not two, it's multi-year for our Snapdragon modem. We're setting no expectations on front end, especially because we engaged it very late." Qualcomm's president added, "We re-engaged probably later than both of us would like, and I think we've been working together to try to get as much as possible done, and take as much possible advantage of what they've done before so that we can actually launch a phone on schedule with 5G. We're very happy with the progress we're making, and I expect that they're going to have a great device."

    Eventually, Apple plans on designing its own 5G modem chips; this year, it purchased the Intel unit that develops smartphone modem chips for a cool $1 billion. While Qualcomm is working hard to get the 5G iPhone out the door, Apple won't equip its handsets with the optimal solution (Snapdragon 5G modem chip + Qualcomm's RF front end) until 2021 at the earliest.



    1. Vokilam

    Posts: 1412; Member since: Mar 15, 2018

    I’m gonna avoid 5G phones for a little while, until I feel that it’s not going to be another case like vaping turned out to be - killing about 50 people so far, but was said to be safe. I think that’s too much radiation to expose yourself too close to.

    3. JCASS889 unregistered

    Get over yourself, the amount of electronic radiation around you already far exceeds what a 5g phone is going to put out. And 50 deaths out of hundreds of millions of people ain't that bad, 99% of those deaths were from teens using bootleg street thc vapes that had zero regulation. Vaping is fine been doing for 5 years and my health has done nothing but improve over cigarettes.

    5. sgodsell

    Posts: 7605; Member since: Mar 16, 2013

    Putting any smoke or vaping particles into your lungs is bad, period. "But you can't cry over spilled milk and besides, both parties are to blame for the mismatch in timing that prevents Apple from using Qualcomm's RF front end system in 2020." Wrong, Apple is 100% to blame, period. Not Qualcomm. Apple didn't like the fact that they were paying a percentage to Qualcomm for each iPhone. Apple wanted that changed, so Apple went through that mess by taking Qualcomm to court. So only Apple is to blame, and nobody else.

    8. tbreezy

    Posts: 224; Member since: Aug 11, 2019

    It’s greed on both sides, actually. Everyone knows Qualcomm don’t play fair, it’s part of the reason why Samsung HAVE TO use Snapdragon in some regions.

    6. vincelongman

    Posts: 5783; Member since: Feb 10, 2013

    I can't believe so many people are worried about 5G They've been watching too much Breaking Bad lol!

    9. Vokilam

    Posts: 1412; Member since: Mar 15, 2018

    You just proved my point - there’s a lot of electronic radiation around me already - why add 5g to that mix - I’m content with 4G LTE speeds already. If we’re switching from 3g or edge speeds to 5g - yeah the risk might be worth it - but 4g to 5g - I just don’t see how 2 extra seconds is worth it.

    4. torr310

    Posts: 1712; Member since: Oct 27, 2011

    Thats totally fine not being rush to get your hands right on to 5G. It's not like you will lose any signals.

    2. User123456789

    Posts: 1259; Member since: Feb 22, 2019

    LOL, Apple says Intel makes better modem. Despite lower speeds. Cool ....

    7. sunnyfpy

    Posts: 296; Member since: May 12, 2013

    Apple no longer leader in phone innovation with super high prices!
    This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.
    FCC OKs Cingular's purchase of AT&T Wireless